Korea's Economy
From the Issue
Korea's Economy Volume 24About Korea's Economy
Korea’s Economy is KEI’s annual journal publication dedicated to the key issues of the day for the Korean economy. Articles in Korea’s Economy are designed to give the casual, but informed reader insight into issues related to Korea’s markets and financial institutions, economic reform, economic relations with the wider world, and North Korea. It is published jointly each year with the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
Author: Jordan Heiber, Jennifer Schuch-Page, Deena Magnall
Region: Asia
Theme: Economics, Foreign Relations, Politics
Location: Korea, South, United States of America
Published May 25, 2011
Download PDFOn 30 June 2007, United States Trade Representative Susan C. Schwab and Republic of Korea Trade Minister Kim Hyun-chong signed the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA), an encompassing economic deal with broad implications for the U.S.-ROK alliance and U.S. engagement in Asia. Noting the occasion, President Bush issued a statement highlighting these dual roles: On the economic front, the president said, the KORUS FTA will promote growth by “generat(ing) export opportunities for U.S. farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, and service suppliers.” Stressing its geopolitical significance, President Bush affirmed that the “agreement will also further enhance the strong United States-Korea partnership, which has served as a force for stability and prosperity in Asia.”
It was only through the immense efforts of both governments that signature of the FTA was successfully achieved. With the expiration of President Bush’s Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) looming as a firm deadline at the end of April 2007, teams of negotiators met regularly over a 10-month period. As expected, challenges arose in a range of sensitive sectors, and the process was not without controversy and setbacks. To their credit, the U.S. and Korean negotiators both recognized that, while neither side would get 100 percent of what it sought, achieving consensus on a comprehensive, high-quality agreement would ultimately benefit both countries.