Website Search

Search our 4839 publications.

Subscribe to our Mailing List!

Sign up for our mailing list to keep up to date on all the latest developments.

On Korea: Academic Paper Series 2008

On Korea: Academic Paper Series
About On Korea: Academic Paper Series

In December 2006, KEI initiated our Academic Paper Series in which we commission up to 10 papers per year with diverse perspectives on original subjects of current interest to Korea watchers. This year-long program provides both leading Korea scholars and new voices from around the world to speak and write on trends and events affecting the Korean peninsula.

View Series Publications
Global Partnership Through Resource Diplomacy: Korea, the United States, and Central Asia
Author: Kent E. Calder, Viktoriya Kim
Region: Asia
Published December 25, 2008
Download PDF

Globalization is a hallmark of the twenty first-century world. As transportation and telecommunications grow in both efficiency and level of performance and as the ambit of the Internet expands, it becomes easier and easier for nations to both connect and coordinate with one another over long distances. And the declining relevance of boundaries in the post–Cold War world makes it more and more feasible politically for them to actually do so.

Korea, the United States, and Central Asia are, of course, located in distant parts of the world, with thousands of miles separating each of the partners to this disparate triangle.Yet all three corners of the triangle have significant and growing economic and geopolitical relevance for one another. All are deeply concerned with problems of global energy—Central Asia as a producer, Korea as a consumer, and the United States in a variety of roles: producer, consumer, and service provider. The three members of this strategic global triangle are all likewise deeply concerned with the future of Russia—that it be a constructive force in world affairs but that it also be constrained from returning to the expansionist, at times imperialist, policies that the Soviet Union once pursued.They all likewise share a deep concern that China’s future be constructive and stable.

There are, of course, important differences of national orientation and approach—not only across the triangle, but also within Central Asia itself. Some are more market oriented, for example, while others are less so. Yet these three broad common concerns—energy, China, and the future of the post-Soviet space—are broadly shared. They provide important reference points for thinking about the prospects of the strategic U.S.-Korea-Central Asian triangle itself.

This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it: Download PDF